Peer feedback with an instructor in the loop.

Assignments connect reviewers to classmates. Responses remain unpublished until the instructor moderates and releases them.

21 / 24

Explain your reasoning · Python LabReview phase · sample

A small circle of useful responses.

ReviewerJordan LeeWork byLiam Chen

ReviewerLiam ChenWork byAvery Morgan

ReviewerAvery MorganWork byJordan Lee

This three-person example assigns one review each. The product supports 1-5, avoids self-review and duplicate assignments, and also allows scoped manual assignment.

Assignment, response and publication are separate.

The instructor can close or reopen the review phase, inspect responses and publish them individually or in a batch. A submitted peer response does not become visible automatically.

What this part of Arc does

Circular assignment without self-review
1-5 assigned reviews
Manual assignment
Review and closed phases
Response moderation
Individual or batch publication

This is a browsable portfolio interpretation of Arc’s workflows with fictional examples. Navigation, filtering and theme previews work here; editing, execution and platform services belong to the original application.

Inside the original application.

This demo view is grounded in Arc’s source. Explore the recorded workflows for a look at the original interface.

All original recordings ↗

Source references & review notes

app/Platform/Portals/Instructor/Controllers/InstructorPeerReviewController.php
app/Platform/Domain/PeerReview/PeerReviewDistributionService.php
app/Platform/Domain/PeerReview/PeerReviewResponseService.php

Read the portal research & evidence boundaries ↗

Source reviewed at development revision 5549bf96. Original captures have their own pinned revisions; the live platform has a separate release.