Skip to content
Tomer Naydnov
arc / explorer

Read-only portfolio demo · Fictional data

Original app recordings
Explore administration / Submitted work

Run the learning platform

The work behind the count.

Inspect example learner records, with drafts, submitted versions and published reviews kept distinct.

18 / 33

Submitted work and review state

Selected learner records. These six examples are a sample of the 66-person fictional program.

Example learner records
LearnerClassroomSubmitted versionsReviewedLatest work
Jordan Lee ↗Python Lab76Revision submitted
Liam ChenPython Lab87Ready for review
Avery MorganPython Lab66Working on a draft
Noah RiveraWeb Studio88Feedback published
Riley BrooksWeb Studio75Ready for review
Alex KimIdea Lab55Revision requested
  1. 01

    Draft

    Work in progress has its own state.

  2. 02

    Submitted version

    The learner commits a version for review.

  3. 03

    Published feedback

    The review remains associated with that submitted version.

  4. 04

    Revision

    A later submission adds history instead of erasing it.

What this part of Arc does
  • Classroom and status filters; supported format tabs
  • Grouped work with format-specific presentation
  • CSV format exports and a full Excel export
  • Version and review context is preserved separately

This is a browsable portfolio interpretation of Arc’s workflows with fictional examples. Navigation, filtering and theme previews work here; editing, execution and platform services belong to the original application.

Inside the original application.

Real Arc screens and recordings, captured locally with fictional people and work.

All original recordings ↗
Arc: Feedback beside the original work
View screen
01 / Instructor

Feedback beside the original work

The instructor reads a student response and writes a concrete next step in the same review panel.

Arc: A clear reason to try again
View screen
02 / Student

A clear reason to try again

The student receives the revision request alongside the previous version, with a direct path to improve the answer.

Watch this workflow in Arc
IN MOTION

From a first idea to a stronger second version

A real student submission, an instructor’s revision request, and an improved answer - with both versions preserved.

Download video
Read the walkthrough
  1. Submit a first idea

    A fictional student writes a first response and submits version 1 of the activity.

  2. Turn feedback into a clear next step

    The instructor reads that response, publishes actionable feedback and requests a revision.

  3. Improve the work. Keep both versions.

    The student reads the feedback and submits an improved version 2, preserving the first submission.

Source references & review notes
  • app/Platform/Portals/Admin/Controllers/AdminSubmissionsController.php
  • app/Platform/Portals/Admin/ViewModels/AdminSubmissionsViewModel.php
  • app/Platform/Portals/Admin/ViewModels/AdminSubmissionGroupPresenter.php
Read the portal research & evidence boundaries ↗

Source reviewed at development revision 5549bf96. Original captures have their own pinned revisions; the live platform has a separate release.